Thursday, November 19, 2009

READ: Prepared Remarks by Secretary Napolitano on Immigration Reform at the Center for American Progress

http://tinyurl.com/yf759w7

Prepared Remarks by Secretary Napolitano on Immigration Reform at the Center for American Progress
share this page

Release Date: November 13, 2009

Washington, D.C.
Center for American Progress
(Remarks as Prepared)


Thank you to John Podesta for that warm introduction. John is a good friend of mine, and I admire the work he's done here at the Center for American Progress to advance the national debate on a range of important issues. John and I have worked together extensively, and I look forward to his continued partnership.


It's not news to say that these are challenging times. From our first day in office, this new Administration was called on to meet an economic and financial crisis as deep and threatening as we've seen since the  Great Depression. The President took bold and difficult steps to prevent the collapse of our financial system and reverse the ominous trends of negative growth and massive jobs loss.


Today, thanks in no small part to the Recovery Act and other steps we have taken, the economy is growing again and job losses have slowed. But that progress is fragile, and we can't let up until all the millions who are looking for work today can find it. Yet we know that surviving this storm isn't enough if we fail to do the things we must to fortify America for the long run.


That's why this Administration is taking on the critical challenges that have been ignored in Washington for too long. We are laying a new foundation for growth and prosperity that will strengthen the economy, families and small businesses throughout the country.


By tackling the issue of health insurance reform, we can bring new security and stability to families and businesses across the country.

By planting the seeds of growth for a new, clean energy economy, we can open the door to the creation of millions of good jobs and secure America's continued leadership in this new century. By making a serious, national commitment to education reform—which means college or technical training accessible to every young person willing to strive for it—we can insure their success, and America's success, in a world where the best educated workers and workforce will win.


So even as we press to end this recession and get America back to work, we are determined to deal with long lingering problems that cloud our future. And another problem that has been punted from year to year, from Congress to Congress, from Administration to Administration, is the clear need for immigration reform.


We all know the story: A steady influx of undocumented workers, crossing our borders illegally in search of work and a better life. A market among employers willing to flout the law in order to hire cheap labor. And as a result, some 12 million people, here illegally, living in the shadows—a source of pain and conflict.


It is wrong. It's an affront to every law-abiding citizen and every employer who plays by the rules.


Like the Administration's other priorities, when it comes to immigration, we

are addressing a status quo that is simply unacceptable. Everybody recognizes that our current system isn't working and that our immigration laws need to change. America's businesses, workers, and faith-based organizations are calling for reform. Law enforcement and government at every level are asking for reform. And at the Department of Homeland Security, we need reform to do our job of enforcing the law and keeping our country secure.


Over the past ten months, we've worked to improve immigration enforcement and border security within the current legal framework. But the more work we do, the more it becomes clear that the laws themselves need to be reformed.


Let me be clear: when I talk about "immigration reform," I'm referring to what I call the "three-legged stool" that includes a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here. That's the way that this problem has to be solved, because we need all three aspects to build a successful system.


This approach has at its heart the conviction that we must demand responsibility and accountability from everyone involved in the system: immigrants, employers and government. And that begins with fair, reliable enforcement.


We know that one-sided reform, as we saw in 1986, cannot succeed. During that reform effort, the enforcement part of the equation was promised, but it didn't materialize. That helped lead to our current situation, and it undermined Americans' confidence in their government's approach to this issue. That mistake can't happen again, and it won't happen again.


The American people expect us to act. Americans value our identity as both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Unfortunately, too many politicians and pundits have treated these values as contradictory. They are not, and we will pursue reforms that emphasize both. The immigrant story is part of what it means to be an American – but failing to fix a broken system that undermines our shared values of lawfulness and fairness is not.

This is why key members of Congress are taking steps toward legislation that will create an immigration system that works. This is why the President continues to be fully committed to reforming our immigration laws, and why he asked me to take a lead role in this effort.

What Has Changed Since 2007

While everyone may agree that the status quo isn't working, what everyone may not be aware of is how much the immigration landscape has changed since comprehensive reform efforts fell short in 2007. I've been dealing hands-on with immigration issues since 1993, so trust me: I know a major shift when I see one, and what I have seen makes reform far more attainable this time around.


For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007. The federal government has dedicated unprecedented resources to the Mexican border in terms of manpower, technology and infrastructure—and it's made a real difference.


Last March, the Obama Administration announced a Southwest Border Initiative that has increased the resources the government is dedicating to combating drug cartels, and the smuggled cash and illegal weapons they thrive on. The Departments of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense have dedicated unprecedented resources to this initiative. This includes additional inspection and surveillance technology, as well as hundreds of personnel specializing in fields like inspection, intelligence and prosecutions. At DHS, we started screening 100 percent of southbound rail shipments for illegal weapons and cash—for the first time ever.


Compared to last year, seizures in all categories—drugs, smuggled cash, and illegal weapons—are up dramatically. For example, just looking at bulk cash, Customs and Border Protection has seized at the border more than $34 million in cash being smuggled southbound so far this year—more than four times as much as at this time last year.


Moreover, the immigration debate in 2007 happened during a period of historically high levels of illegal entry into the United States. Two years later, because of better enforcement and the current economic circumstances, those numbers have fallen sharply. The flow has reduced significantly – by more than half from the busiest years, proving we are in a much different environment than we were before.


These are major differences that should change the immigration conversation.


In 2007, many members of Congress said that they could support immigration reform in the future, but only if we first made significant progress securing the border. This reflected the real concern of many Americans that the government was not serious about enforcing the law. Fast-forward to today, and many of the benchmarks these members of Congress set in 2007 have been met. For example, the Border Patrol has increased its forces to more than 20,000 officers, and DHS has built more than 600 miles of border fencing. Both of these milestones demonstrate that we have gotten Congress' message.


We've also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites. We have replaced old policies that merely looked tough with policies that are designed to actually be effective.


We've revised and standardized our immigration-enforcement agreements with state and local law enforcement to make sure that these agencies are effective forcemultipliers in our efforts to apprehend dangerous criminal aliens. We've expanded the Secure Communities program, which identifies illegal aliens being booked into local jails. Yesterday, we marked the end of the first year for this program, which is being used by 95 jurisdictions and has identified more than 111,000 criminal aliens.


Furthermore, we've transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration. We are auditing the books of thousands of employers suspected of relying on illegal labor to achieve an unfair advantage in the marketplace. As part of this effort, Immigration and Customs Enforcement audited more employers suspected of hiring illegal labor in a single day in July than had been audited in all of 2008. We're also encouraging workplace compliance by expanding and improving the E-Verify system—an Internet-based system that allows participating employers to electronically verify the employment eligibility of new hires. More than 167,000 employers at 639,000 worksites use E-Verify. In the past month, the program has grown at the rate of nearly 2,000 employers per week.


Improved interior and worksite enforcement is a critical part of comprehensive immigration reform. We've demonstrated that when it comes to that issue, this Administration is committed to action.


In addition, recent improvements at managing the legal immigration system also prove that the federal government is ready to handle major reform.


We've ended a year-long backlog for background checks on applicants for green cards and naturalization. We've expanded the opportunity for a widow to gain legal status here, despite the untimely death of her U.S. citizen spouse.


We've launched a new interactive website that allows people to receive information about the status of their immigration cases by e-mail or text

message, and we have reduced the time it takes to process those cases.


In addition to these changes, since 2007 we have made significant strides in technology. For example, new biometric technology allows us to take the fingerprints of people coming into the United States and compare their prints against databases we couldn't access before. This means we have new and enhanced abilities to quickly identify people committing immigration fraud, either by using someone else's documents or by forging documents to escape detection for a past crime or immigration violation. We also have enhanced our capacity to exclude those suspected of supporting terrorism or other serious international crimes before they enter our country.


Overall, these and other changes make comprehensive immigration reform more attainable as a matter of both politics and policy. At the border, in the interior of the country, and when it comes to legal immigration, the government has made significant strides to improve enforcement. This is a fundamental change from 2007.


Here's the other thing that has shifted in this debate: a larger segment of the American public has embraced the need to engage this debate and arrive at a sensible solution to this problem. CAP has helped to document this shift.


There are leaders of the law enforcement community speaking out, saying that immigration reform is vital to their ability to do their jobs keeping Americans safe. Faith leaders, including the National Association of Evangelicals, have announced their support for immigration reform as a moral and practical issue. We are seeing more business leaders and more labor leaders engaged in this debate in a constructive way than we have ever seen before.


These constituencies have all arrived at the same conclusion that prevails among the American people: this is a problem that needs to be fixed—and the best way to ensure that we can uphold our laws is to make sure our laws are rational and enforceable.

Why DHS Needs Immigration Reform

That reality is apparent to us at DHS. Over the past year, as this Administration has pursued more effective strategies within the current laws, the picture of how exactly those laws need to be changed has become clearer than ever before. In the past ten months, we have made tough choices, and implemented significant reforms within the current legal framework—but they are not enough to create the system that we want or that we need.


If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act.

When it comes to immigration, I took an oath as Secretary of Homeland Security to secure the nation by enforcing the law and managing legal flows across the border. Let me be clear: to do this job as effectively as possible, DHS needs immigration reform.


Reform legislation would provide lasting and dedicated resources at our borders, and provide some critical legal tools that we don't currently have to combat smuggling organizations. For example, we need tougher anti-smuggling laws in dealing with the aggravated crimes smugglers commit—including assaulting law enforcement officers, endangering children, threatening relatives and abandoning people in the desert— hundreds of whom succumb to death from heat and lack of water. We also need to update current laws that don't cover some of the new means by which criminals conduct their business. For instance, today's smugglers and drug traffickers often move cash through "stored value" cards, which aren't even considered monetary instruments under the current money-smuggling laws.


In addition, we need improvements to the current law when it comes to interior and worksite enforcement. Dishonest businesses often ignore the civil fines for illegal employment now on the books because they're so low. It's also very difficult to prosecute these crimes as felonies because of the over-elaborate intent requirements built into the current statutes.


Moreover, some current laws covering immigration-related fraud have to be brought more in line with common sense. Right now, a corrupt immigration attorney who facilitates hundreds of immigration violations by knowingly helping aliens fraudulently seek asylum or permanent residence is treated almost the same as an alien who buys a single fake green card.


On top of this, in order to have fully effective law enforcement, we need Congress to create the legal foundation for bringing the millions of illegal immigrants in this country out of the shadows, require them to register and pay all taxes they owe, and enforce the penalties that they will have to pay as part of earning legal status. Let me emphasize this: we will never have fully effective law enforcement or national security as long as so many millions remain in the shadows.


Making sure these people become full taxpayers and pay their fair share will both benefit our economy and make it easier to enforce the laws against unscrupulous or exploitive employers. A tough and fair pathway to earned legal status will mandate that illegal immigrants meet a number of requirements—including registering, paying a fine, passing a criminal background check, fully paying all taxes and learning English.


These are substantial requirements that will make sure this population gets right with the law. It will help fix our broken system.

The Broad Need for Reform

While it's important to emphasize the need for immigration reform from an enforcement perspective, the need for reform stretches far beyond those reasons. We have to make sure the immigration system works to support American families, businesses and workers.


As part of the Administration's outreach on this issue, my Department has held stakeholder meetings with more than 1,000 people and organizations across the country. The businesses, community leaders, labor leaders, faith groups and law enforcement we've met with all have different stories, but they all reach the same conclusion: we need reform. This reform will be part of the new foundation for growth, prosperity, and security that this Administration is working to create.


Our system must be strong enough to prevent illegal entry and to get criminal aliens off our streets and out of the country. But it must also be smart enough to reward the hard work and entrepreneurial spirit that immigrants have always brought to America—traits that have built our nation.


Requiring illegal immigrants to register to earn legal status, as I discussed earlier, will strengthen our economy as these immigrants become full-paying taxpayers. As labor leaders have made clear to me, immigration reform will be a boon to American workers. Think about it: unions will never achieve the best terms for workers when a large part of the workforce is illegal and operates in a shadow economy. By contrast, the status quo not only hurts American workers, it also stifles potential opportunities to grow our economy.


A few months ago, I held a forum where I heard from technology executives in Silicon Valley, our country's center of technological innovation. They told me that they want to increase their workforce and help get the economy moving again, but some of the major barriers they have to growing their companies are visa laws that make it difficult for high-skilled foreigners to stay here to work. Today, we have a system where America educates many of the brightest individuals from around the world, and then tells them to leave the country when many of them would rather start their own ventures or strengthen businesses right here in America. This hurts the economy for all of us, and it has to change.


Going forward, our visa policies must work for every sector of our economy, and across the income scale. In my meetings, leaders in agriculture, service industries and other fields have told me that current visa policies are hindering the growth of businesses looking to expand. To address this economic need, we need carefully crafted programs that allow American businesses to hire needed foreign workers while protecting the labor and health-and-safety rights of all workers. We need to revise our current provisions for legal migration to help assure a legal workforce in cases where businesses can't find Americans to fill their jobs. These changes will make our economy stronger and more prosperous at all levels.


Community and faith leaders have also emphasized to me that we need reform because of how difficult the current laws can be on families, especially families of mixed legal status. Our immigration system is outdated where families are concerned, and we need to modernize and streamline the laws governing this process.


No one should have to wait in a line for years in order to reunite with a spouse or a young child. And we must protect the families of our men and women in the armed forces, some of whom volunteer to serve this country before they even become naturalized citizens. These individuals risk their lives to ensure the safety of all Americans. We have a duty to ensure that their families are treated with dignity when their soldiers return from combat.

I have had the honor of administering the oath of citizenship to active-duty personnel who had been serving our country long before I swore them in. These men and women are a reminder, as the President told them on the day of their swearing-in, that America is not just "a collection of rights," but also "a set of responsibilities...it depends on each of us doing our part."

Conclusion

So we all have to do our part to have a system that works. At the end of the day, when it comes to immigration, people need to be able to trust the system. Americans need to know that their government is committed to enforcing the law and securing the border—and that it takes this responsibility seriously. Law enforcement needs to have better legal tools and the necessary resources to deal with border-related and immigration-related crime. Businesses must be able find the workers they need here in America, rather than having to move overseas. Immigrants need to be able to plan their lives—they need to know that once we reform the laws, we're going to have a system that works, and that the contours of our immigration laws will last. And they need to know that they will have as many responsibilities as they do rights.


The President is committed to this issue because the need for immigration reform is so clear. This Administration does not shy away from taking on the big challenges of the 21st century, challenges that have been ignored too long and hurt our families and businesses. When Congress is ready to act, we will be ready to support them.


As I said earlier, we are both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. This is ingrained in our national character and it has helped make America the great nation that it is. But we must modernize our laws for the 21st century so that this vision can endure. This is a task that is critical, that is attainable, and that we are fully committed to fulfilling.

Thank you.

###

This page was last reviewed/modified on November 13, 2009.

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Education for Liberation! General Amnesty Now!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://twitter.com/Peta51
http://help-matrix.ning.com/ 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Aztatl Garza> Re: Toman su familia en un abrazo bien fuerte. Hold your families in a tight embrace.

Gracias Aztatl ~ Clearly we need to work on mass mobilization and it all begins in our own inner consciousness. The repressed mentality is marked by a desire for a fear of the truth, a desire for and fear of freedom, a desire for and fear of organization lest we lose our ego-centric individuality.

In connected reality, there are not United Nations, there can be no true independent nation when the Amerikan Empire rules the roost! Nationhood cannot be only a subjective state of mind with the hand holding a flimsy flag, it must manifest in objective existence with the ownership and control of the viable social institutions in our lives.

In connected reality, there are no United States. Despite the narrow election of President Obama and his regime the so-called United States are still divided based upon various labels: Democrats vs. Republicans; Left vs. Right; North vs. South; White vs. Black; Citizens vs. Immigrants.

As an endangered species of life we need to evolve into a higher consciousness that bonds us together as one humane family surviving day-by-day, seeking to meet our basic survival needs, working together, loving together and knowing the grand strategic aim of toppling and transforming the Amerikan Empire by any means mandatory.

We can never lose so long as we never give up!
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Education for Liberation! Venceremos Unidos!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://twitter.com/Peta51
http://help-matrix.ning.com/ 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




From: Aztatl Garza <aztatlxikano@gmail.com>
To: NetworkAztlan_News@yahoogroups.com; intexile@iww.org; nm_raza_unida@yahoogroups.com; todoslibre@egroups.com; vrodrig5@csulb.edu; Alb Peace & Justice <mail@abqpeaceandjustice.org>; Alb. IWW <abq@iww.org>; Allen Cooper <ac611@msn.com>; Aztatl Garza <aztatlxikano@gmail.com>; Bianca Encinias <msbianca@sneej.org>; Bob Anderson <citizen@comcast.net>; CJ Levine <claytonlevine@gmail.com>; Confed.delAguila y elCondor <Kozkakuautli@gmail.com>; Darcy H Brazen <dbrazen@unm.edu>; "davidsanchezphd@webtv.net" <davidsanchezphd@webtv.net>; Ebustill <Ebustill@aol.com>; Edna Casman <ecasman@yahoo.com>; Elena Herrada <Elenaherrada@comcast.net>; Enrique Cardiel <magonista66@yahoo.com>; Food Not Bombs <fnb_505@yahoo.com>; FRANK SIFUENTES <conzafos@msn.com>; Greg s.texas Rodriguez <leftovergreg@yahoo.com>; HanaClay Li <hanali@gmail.com>; International Contacts 2 <organizateraza@hotmail.com>; James Marquez <latino_thinker@yahoo.com>; Jane Yee <jane.cambio@yahoo.com>; Janet <hootaway@comcast.net>; Javier Rodriguez <bajolamiradejavier@yahoo.com>; Jeanne <stopthewarmachine@comcast.net>; Jesse Enriquez (Lipan) <NDeLipanje@yahoo.com>; John Salazar <Salazarl8@aol.com>; JorgeDanzante GarciaSundancer <jgarcia@istec.org>; José Cuello <josecuello@wowway.com>; Joy Soler <solerjoy@hotmail.com>; Julie England <jengland745@hotmail.com>; KarenDowntownLib. K. Schmiege <kschmiege@cabq.gov>; LaloXikano AlcarazCartoonist <laloalcaraz@yahoo.com>; Lisa Burns <solas@unm.edu>; Marc Page <lovarchy@gmail.com>; Maria Cecilia Gallegos <xicaguerillera@hotmail.com>; Mary(Poet) Oishi <poetoishi@yahoo.com>; Maurus Chino <mauruschino@yahoo.com>; Mazatzin AZTEKAYOLOKALLI <zemazatzin@hotmail.com>; MEChA Unm <mechaunm@yahoo.com>; ourania tserotas <ourania_tserotas@hotmail.com>; PatriciaSan Jose Juarez <pjuarezg@yahoo.com>; Phil Indig. Konstantin <philkon@rocketmail.com>; renee wolters <rrwolters@aol.com>; Rolando J. Garcia <rjesusgarcia@gmail.com>; Ruth Millan <rutholivarmillan@sbcglobal.net>; Santiago ObispoVenezuela <sobispo@gmail.com>; "SF, CA" <info@freedomarchives.org>; "sparrow@iww.org IWW Editor" <sparrow@iww.org>; StopTheWarMachine <swm-d@swcp.com>; Teresa Marquez <andaluz@unm.edu>; Terry Schleder <tschleder@gmail.com>; "tlacayaotzin@aol.com" <tlacayaotzin@aol.com>; tochtli Califas <tochtli@berkeley.edu>; Todd Mireles <mirelese@msu.edu>; Tony Herrera <therrera1550@yahoo.com>; Tupac Enrique Acosta <chantlaca@tonatierra.org>; "Vanessa Maracaibo, Venz Di Domenico" <van3hijos@yahoo.com>; Viola Wilkins <violawil@bigpond.net.au>; Virginia Hampton <vhampton@cnm.edu>; Zap Mex <loszapatistasnoestansolos@yahoo.es>; Yafah Rai <ascentialkeyz4@yahoo.com>; Jenny Beyss <j_beyss@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 8:14:04 AM
Subject: Re: [NetworkAztlan_News] FYI: Africa: World Food Summit throws away chance to stop one billion going hungry

 

A Thanksgiving Day message:
 
false hopes otra vez
 
The U.N., the epitome of neo-liberalism, & the g8 wolves in sheep's clothing which are never satiated, make a nice married couple, both oppose our people's organizations to improve our lives by sidetracking the work we need to do in order to change our lives, Everyone by right of birth deserves the food, medicine, work, education and land that we need.

So many people around the world falsely believe that the UN is the only hope we have and will do nothing to oppose it, train it by infusing everyday people, off the street if there are no trustworthy politicians,  because billions of people are going to go hungry ? The UN is famous for teetering on the fence. Their twin is reflected in the sold out labor unions which lose millions of dollars in contract concession's that belong to unionized workers who create the wealth of the world.

Open your eyes and hearts amerika. The greed thickens, a juicy gravy for the wealthy.

Thanksgiving day needs to be synonymous with our commitment to create organizations at the work place and community level to make change happen.

Clearly, we must do it ourselves. Obviously we cannot trust anyone else.

~~~~this here is brother aztatl broadcasting from the barrio near the reservation system that confines and abandons our indigenous brothers and sisters, often to poverty and violence~~~~ organize

If I am elected I promise not only one scrawny anorexic chicken in every pot, but a giant turkey (and all the fixings) that cannot fit into an overwhelming  cauldron of good will; not just 40 acres and a broken down mule, but a hundred acres to each person to share with everyone else, and to share with all the plants and animals of our Earth Mother, who nurtures and feeds us...
 
Toman su familia en un abrazo bien fuerte.
Hold your families in a tight embrace.
Have fun this holiday season, we deserve it. 
 
 
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:39 PM, PETER S LOPEZ <peter.lopez51@ yahoo.com> wrote:
 

http://tinyurl. com/ybrallh

ActionAid (Washington,  DC)

Africa: World Food Summit throws away chance to stop one billion going hungry

18 November 2009


press release

The UN World Food Summit threw away a great chance to stop more than one billion people going hungry.

"You would think that the 20 per cent jump in the number of hungry since 2005, would spur determined and decisive action. But the World Food Summit failed to make any major breakthroughs. And the G8 leaders didn't even bother turning up.  Warm words don't fill empty stomachs," said Adriano Campolina, ActionAid's Regional Director for Latin America.

One of the biggest issues left untackled was the challenge of food security and agriculture while the reformed UN Committee on Food Security is still without sufficient funds, risking it becoming just a talking shop.

Smallholder farmers in developing countries are still vulnerable to the harmful effects of climate change as no signals were sent to Copenhagen to provide ADDITIONAL resources to help them adapt.

"The World Food Summit announced the need to increase production by 70 per cent in order to feed growing populations of up to 9 billion by 2050 through bio-technology," said Francisco Sarmento, ActionAid's head of food rights.

"But we need to fundamentally re-think the way we grow food if we are to sustain people and the planet in future.

"Evidence shows that supporting small family farms with ecologically sound farming practices is the way forward. Agriculture is currently contributing to around 30% of climate change emissions and is degrading the environment. Something needs to change – and fast."

The summit offered more of the same – with increased use of'biotechnology' .  "World leaders have overlooked the opportunity to follow more sustainable options helping to mitigate climate change and feed the world," said Sarmento.

"Governments should have declared that any climate change agreement in Copenhagen should commit resources IN ADDITION to existing aid budgets to help smallholder farmers adapt to climate change."

Meanwhile in the last seven days, nearly 180,000 citizens from around the world have signed a joint Avaaz-ActionAid petition calling on G8 governments to deliver, in full, the $20 billion developing country agriculture and food security package pledged last July.

On World Food Day, hundreds of thousands of people rallied across 25 countries, with ActionAid demanding that governments 'free the billion hungry people' and take action at the World Food Summit.  L'Aquila was a welcome step in the right direction but there must now be a timetable for disbursement, ensuring the pledge is delivered in full, with genuinely new funds.

President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso, announcing this week that one fifth of the G8 money would come from the EC, failed to mention that any of it was new," said Francisco Sarmento, ActionAid's Head of Food Rights.

"His pledge was a repacking of existing commitments, such as funds from the one billion euro food facility approved last December, the food security thematic programme and the European Development Fund."

Copyright © 2009 ActionAid. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com) .

++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
Education for Liberation! Venceremos Unidos!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@ yahoo.com 
http://twitter. com/Peta51
http://help- matrix.ning. com/ 
++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Humane- Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/NetworkAzt lan_News/
++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/THIRD- WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++


__._,_.___
Monitor: Peter S. Lopez "Peta": peter.lopez51@yahoo.com
List owner: Guillermo Bejarano: aztlannet@yahoo.com

To see and modify all of your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
You can subscribe to four (4) groups:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Arte
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Action
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Native-Views
OFFICIAL WEBSITE http://www.NetworkAztlan.com
.

__,_._,___

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

FYI: Africa: World Food Summit throws away chance to stop one billion going hungry

http://tinyurl.com/ybrallh

ActionAid (Washington, DC)

Africa: World Food Summit throws away chance to stop one billion going hungry

18 November 2009


press release

The UN World Food Summit threw away a great chance to stop more than one billion people going hungry.


"You would think that the 20 per cent jump in the number of hungry since 2005, would spur determined and decisive action. But the World Food Summit failed to make any major breakthroughs. And the G8 leaders didn't even bother turning up.  Warm words don't fill empty stomachs," said Adriano Campolina, ActionAid's Regional Director for Latin America.


One of the biggest issues left untackled was the challenge of food security and agriculture while the reformed UN Committee on Food Security is still without sufficient funds, risking it becoming just a talking shop.


Smallholder farmers in developing countries are still vulnerable to the harmful effects of climate change as no signals were sent to Copenhagen to provide ADDITIONAL resources to help them adapt.


"The World Food Summit announced the need to increase production by 70 per cent in order to feed growing populations of up to 9 billion by 2050 through bio-technology," said Francisco Sarmento, ActionAid's head of food rights.


"But we need to fundamentally re-think the way we grow food if we are to sustain people and the planet in future.


"Evidence shows that supporting small family farms with ecologically sound farming practices is the way forward. Agriculture is currently contributing to around 30% of climate change emissions and is degrading the environment. Something needs to change – and fast."


The summit offered more of the same – with increased use of 'biotechnology'.  "World leaders have overlooked the opportunity to follow more sustainable options helping to mitigate climate change and feed the world," said Sarmento.


"Governments should have declared that any climate change agreement in Copenhagen should commit resources IN ADDITION to existing aid budgets to help smallholder farmers adapt to climate change."


Meanwhile in the last seven days, nearly 180,000 citizens from around the world have signed a joint Avaaz-ActionAid petition calling on G8 governments to deliver, in full, the $20 billion developing country agriculture and food security package pledged last July.


On World Food Day, hundreds of thousands of people rallied across 25 countries, with ActionAid demanding that governments 'free the billion hungry people' and take action at the World Food Summit.  L'Aquila was a welcome step in the right direction but there must now be a timetable for disbursement, ensuring the pledge is delivered in full, with genuinely new funds.


President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso, announcing this week that one fifth of the G8 money would come from the EC, failed to mention that any of it was new," said Francisco Sarmento, ActionAid's Head of Food Rights.


"His pledge was a repacking of existing commitments, such as funds from the one billion euro food facility approved last December, the food security thematic programme and the European Development Fund."

Copyright © 2009 ActionAid. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com).


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Education for Liberation! Venceremos Unidos!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://twitter.com/Peta51
http://help-matrix.ning.com/ 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



You Have Won 470,000 Euro

Attn Web/Internet user!!!

This is to notify you that your e-mail address was entered during the
annual Euro Milliones Lottery selection Draw and have won the sum of
470,000 euros.

You are to contact below claim officer for immediate process of your
claim; Remember to quote these numbers below for verification by the
company.

REF: ESP/WIN/008/02/10/MA
BATCH: EURO/1007/444/606/09

You should include Your Name, Address, Sex, Age, Occupation, Nationality,
Phone numbers and Fax number.

Mr. Antonio Guzman (Claim Officer)
Email: sicclaimdept@luckymail.com
Tel: 0034634151884

Best regards,
Dr. Maria Jose Muyor.
Euro Milliones Lottery

****************************************************************************************
This email is confidential and is intended solely for the person or Entity
that own the email address. If you have received this message in error, we
inform you that the content in it is reserved and unauthorized use is
prohibited by law, therefore, please, please notify us by e-mail.
****************************************************************************************

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Interview with Honduras Foreign Minister Patricia Rodas

http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=16241
 
Interview with Honduras Foreign Minister Patricia Rodas

Posted By the editor On November 17, 2009 @ 1:15 am


Honduran Foreign Minister Patricia Rodas.  Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA

Honduran Foreign Minister Patricia Rodas. Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA


HAVANA TIMES, Nov 16 ([2] [3] Rel-UITA) - At the end of a press conference held at the Honduran embassy in Managua, Nicaragua, the liberal mayor of San Pedro Sula, Rodolfo Padilla Sunseri, announced his decision to drop out of the elections.


Along with him would also be withdrawing more than 50 candidates for the legislature and a hundred candidates for mayoral and vice mayor positions, all from the same party.


At this same time, Rel-UITA had the opportunity to speak with the legitimate foreign minister of Honduras, Patricia Rodas.


With only two weeks before the elections, the delaying tactics of the de facto government and the other institutions of the State continue to block the reinstatement of President Manuel Zelaya.  Why is there this fear of reinstating the president?


The fear on the part of the forces of the oligarchy, of the hardest sectors of the political right wing of the country, of the military and of international sectors that defend their common economic interests, is a fear of the popular leadership that President Zelaya possess.


It is the fear of the Honduran people themselves, of their awakened consciousness, of their capacity to resist and to distrust what is promised by these old sectors, who are the same ones that have subjected the country to poverty and inequality for the last 30 years, and who have infiltrated the political parties and the State.


It is also the fear of their same errors and perversity shown when they wanted to detain, bury and banish the people's leaders, believing that in this way they'd be able to stop an entire people in struggle.  In hoping to again apply the same methods of terror and repression as in the 1980s, this fear is slowly converting into hate, and with the participation of the most retrograde sectors of religious fundamentalism and the manipulation of the media.


Do you believe that part of this fear is also due to the possibility that, once restored, President Zelaya could back some candidate considered to be a non coup supporter?


We must remember that the Supreme Electoral Court is composed of three magistrates who are intimately tied to the coup d'état.   They are capable of doing anything to satisfy their interests and those who pay them.  So it's very probably that they've already selected the candidate they'll end up electing; it doesn't matter what the popular vote is.


Notwithstanding, President Zelaya doesn't need to be restored to attempt to direct the popular consciousness.  That is not the objective; rather, it is reconstructing the constitutional thread broken by the coup.  The forces behind the coup are afraid, even of having that day come and looking at him in the eye, because they know they won't be able to bear his gaze. They are afraid of facing their own shame and misery.


What elections will be held on November 29?  Are you in agreement with the call to boycott them?

Patricia Rodas.  Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA

Patricia Rodas. Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA


There is already a significant group of candidates that has withdrawn, and the impression is that these elections will be characterized by mass abstention, though an attempt will be made by the coup forces to legitimize them through deception and lies.  However, the people have already turned their back on these political parties and those who are the kingpins of fraud, lies, coups, rifles, repression against the people, and spilled blood.


On November 29 those kingpins will experience isolation by their people, though of course they will commit fraud and continue violating human rights.  There will be people who will go to the polls tied from head to foot, deceived and fearful of what happens next, sure of being closely controlled by the military and the police.  Terror, disinformation, deception and isolation of the coup forces will be the tone of these elections, which will not end up being legitimized.


How do you assess the position of the international community in the face of this event?


The whole world condemned the coup d'état for all it represented, and everyone knows perfectly well that those same forces that executed the coup are today seeking to legitimize it through the elections.


The international community has maintained firmness in not wanting to recognize these elections; however, we are seeing how the United States -which represents a very small minority in this case- has begun to show signs of contradictions in its own position.  In this sense, it's difficult to understand the last statement by State Department Undersecretary Thomas Shannon.

Here, we are not seeing a dispute between two individuals, as some US sectors believe.  The countries of the world know that there was a massive attack by an army, supported by a civilian group with powerful economic interests, against an entire people.


The countries of the American continent that might wind up supporting these elections are those managed by US politics and the interests of the big transnationals; their aim will be to prevent governments on the continent from continuing to pursuing deep social transformations.  The rest of the world will reject these farcical elections.


Do you believe that the recognition of the results by the United States would place heavy pressure on other countries of the continent and the world?


It's difficult to foresee, but we hope the international community maintains its rationality. However, happens what happens, in Honduras we first have to recover the constitutional thread, and we will not endorse processes consisting of lies and crimes.


The US State Department should ask: "What are the guarantees of transparency that these gentlemen, who have committed crimes and who continue committing them, have provided to the government of the United States and its partners on the continent?"  If they don't have an answer, I'll assume that they're also part of the fraud.


Are you disappointed with President Obama's administration?

Humanity is beginning to doubt its own illusions, and I'm the part of humanity.  I respect President Obama, because there is still time for history to judge him, but it will be necessary to grade the outcome, and that is yet to be seen.


The dispossessed of the world saw themselves reflected in a man who assumed power in the greatest power on the planet.  A nation that has the power to make war but also peace, though up to now it has seemed to prefer war, perhaps because the arms industry is economic support for a government that is a gendarme and takes care of the interests of its transnationals around the world.


However, President Obama is trying to be the president of all Americans and has left other sectors of his government in the hands of imperial politics.  This empire is not the people of the United States but the transnationals, which are all over the world and possess a government, an army and diplomacy that defend their interests.


Honduras has been his first experience and, at the same time, his first disappointment on the continent when discovering that his good intentions were not enough to brake the politics of the empire.  So, we continue believing that it's possible that some day this president, who wants to be fair with his people, will also rise in rebellion against the empire that is destroying the continent through its local flunkies, and that he too will unite with the exploited people of the world.


Do you agree with those who say that there was direct involvement on the part of the United States in the coup, and that this country had the objective of stopping the advance of ALBA in the region and to shift the position being taken in this part of the continent?


It seems like a perfect crime, but all crimes have their errors, and in this case they chose the wrong country, president, people and historical moment.  We cannot speak of the involvement of the United States in the coup, but of a sector of its government, because in Honduras not a leaf moves without the accompaniment or knowledge of these traditional sectors of US politics, who are those that defend the interests of the empire of the transnationals.


What we have to do is identify who are the criminals in our country and denounce them before the world. Those who are outside of Honduras will have to be judged by all peoples of the world for their intervention and interference, which historically has brought us coup d'états, foreign military bases, and the terror and horror of war.


With regard to ALBA, it's evident that on the continent it was looked at as an initiative where it suited only the left.  But suddenly President Zelaya, a traditional-style liberal, decided along with his people to join this initiative.  This generated tremendous fear.  The poor example of Honduras had to be extirpated, because it had also been born in a country whose economy depends on the United States, and where there's one of its largest military bases.

Intolerance reemerged from the ashes when Honduras accepted the ALBA.   At the national level there were too many interests to defend on the part of the coup forces.  There was no pre-written script, but rather a structure that was prepared to act at any moment, with a great capacity for reaction, and that was made up of the army, the media, the heads of the church and political forces infiltrated within the State and economic powers capable of maintaining it.


However, they weren't able to anticipate the people's response.  They've not been able to stabilize their power and won't be able to legitimize even taking a bath in holy water, because they'll always be criminals, and this is generating great panic among them.


What role has the resistance played in this whole process?


It's had a fundamental role.  The resistance is an enormous part of the Honduran society that stood up; it struggles and marches, telling to history and the world what it is to feel and think, and the yearnings of an entire people.  The resistance is the conscience of the Honduran people and the opposition to the groups in power, those same powers that have plundered, crushed and humiliated them.  But they are now standing up, with dignity.


On January 27, 2010 ends the mandate of President Zelaya and that of his cabinet. What will you do after that date and after having spent four months outside of your country?


I don't have any proceedings pending against me in Honduras that would prevent me from returning.  The constitutional government ends when the reinstated president gives it up as ended.  When he stops being a servant of our people from public office, I will return to my people, as I have always done - like the two years during which I experienced my first coup d'état, my first confinement and exile. I will return to continue struggling beside my people. I will return to where my people love me. That's where I'll be.


1 Comment (Open | Close)

1 Comment To "Interview with Honduras FM Rodas"

#1 Comment By grok On November 17, 2009 @ 11:39 am

So after the 2009.11.29 elections… what? What will the honduran Resistance do? There will be an 'elected' coup government which will claim even more legitimacy then — and be aided in this by world reaction, and even plenty of liberals. And they will NOT allow hondurans to stage a Constituent Assembly. No way.

So what is the Resistance going to DO, then..?

[And for the record: there is no such thing as an "international community", either. That's another (longtime) fraudulent concept that should be put to bed. However, there is still class struggle. THAT is real.]


Article printed from Havana Times.org: nterview with Honduras FM Rodas

Posted By the editor On November 17, 2009 @ 1:15 am In Interviews, Updates, leftcol2 | 1 Comment

[1] Exclusive by Rel-UITA

Honduran Foreign Minister Patricia Rodas.  Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA

Honduran Foreign Minister Patricia Rodas. Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA

HAVANA TIMES, Nov 16 ([2] [3] Rel-UITA) - At the end of a press conference held at the Honduran embassy in Managua, Nicaragua, the liberal mayor of San Pedro Sula, Rodolfo Padilla Sunseri, announced his decision to drop out of the elections.

Along with him would also be withdrawing more than 50 candidates for the legislature and a hundred candidates for mayoral and vice mayor positions, all from the same party.

At this same time, Rel-UITA had the opportunity to speak with the legitimate foreign minister of Honduras, Patricia Rodas.

With only two weeks before the elections, the delaying tactics of the de facto government and the other institutions of the State continue to block the reinstatement of President Manuel Zelaya.  Why is there this fear of reinstating the president?

The fear on the part of the forces of the oligarchy, of the hardest sectors of the political right wing of the country, of the military and of international sectors that defend their common economic interests, is a fear of the popular leadership that President Zelaya possess.

It is the fear of the Honduran people themselves, of their awakened consciousness, of their capacity to resist and to distrust what is promised by these old sectors, who are the same ones that have subjected the country to poverty and inequality for the last 30 years, and who have infiltrated the political parties and the State.

It is also the fear of their same errors and perversity shown when they wanted to detain, bury and banish the people's leaders, believing that in this way they'd be able to stop an entire people in struggle.  In hoping to again apply the same methods of terror and repression as in the 1980s, this fear is slowly converting into hate, and with the participation of the most retrograde sectors of religious fundamentalism and the manipulation of the media.

Do you believe that part of this fear is also due to the possibility that, once restored, President Zelaya could back some candidate considered to be a non coup supporter?

We must remember that the Supreme Electoral Court is composed of three magistrates who are intimately tied to the coup d'état.   They are capable of doing anything to satisfy their interests and those who pay them.  So it's very probably that they've already selected the candidate they'll end up electing; it doesn't matter what the popular vote is.

Notwithstanding, President Zelaya doesn't need to be restored to attempt to direct the popular consciousness.  That is not the objective; rather, it is reconstructing the constitutional thread broken by the coup.  The forces behind the coup are afraid, even of having that day come and looking at him in the eye, because they know they won't be able to bear his gaze. They are afraid of facing their own shame and misery.

What elections will be held on November 29?  Are you in agreement with the call to boycott them?

Patricia Rodas.  Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA

Patricia Rodas. Photo: Giorgio Trucchi, rel-UITA

There is already a significant group of candidates that has withdrawn, and the impression is that these elections will be characterized by mass abstention, though an attempt will be made by the coup forces to legitimize them through deception and lies.  However, the people have already turned their back on these political parties and those who are the kingpins of fraud, lies, coups, rifles, repression against the people, and spilled blood.

On November 29 those kingpins will experience isolation by their people, though of course they will commit fraud and continue violating human rights.  There will be people who will go to the polls tied from head to foot, deceived and fearful of what happens next, sure of being closely controlled by the military and the police.  Terror, disinformation, deception and isolation of the coup forces will be the tone of these elections, which will not end up being legitimized.

How do you assess the position of the international community in the face of this event?

The whole world condemned the coup d'état for all it represented, and everyone knows perfectly well that those same forces that executed the coup are today seeking to legitimize it through the elections.

The international community has maintained firmness in not wanting to recognize these elections; however, we are seeing how the United States -which represents a very small minority in this case- has begun to show signs of contradictions in its own position.  In this sense, it's difficult to understand the last statement by State Department Undersecretary Thomas Shannon.

Here, we are not seeing a dispute between two individuals, as some US sectors believe.  The countries of the world know that there was a massive attack by an army, supported by a civilian group with powerful economic interests, against an entire people.

The countries of the American continent that might wind up supporting these elections are those managed by US politics and the interests of the big transnationals; their aim will be to prevent governments on the continent from continuing to pursuing deep social transformations.  The rest of the world will reject these farcical elections.

Do you believe that the recognition of the results by the United States would place heavy pressure on other countries of the continent and the world?

It's difficult to foresee, but we hope the international community maintains its rationality. However, happens what happens, in Honduras we first have to recover the constitutional thread, and we will not endorse processes consisting of lies and crimes.

The US State Department should ask: "What are the guarantees of transparency that these gentlemen, who have committed crimes and who continue committing them, have provided to the government of the United States and its partners on the continent?"  If they don't have an answer, I'll assume that they're also part of the fraud.

Are you disappointed with President Obama's administration?

Humanity is beginning to doubt its own illusions, and I'm the part of humanity.  I respect President Obama, because there is still time for history to judge him, but it will be necessary to grade the outcome, and that is yet to be seen.

The dispossessed of the world saw themselves reflected in a man who assumed power in the greatest power on the planet.  A nation that has the power to make war but also peace, though up to now it has seemed to prefer war, perhaps because the arms industry is economic support for a government that is a gendarme and takes care of the interests of its transnationals around the world.

However, President Obama is trying to be the president of all Americans and has left other sectors of his government in the hands of imperial politics.  This empire is not the people of the United States but the transnationals, which are all over the world and possess a government, an army and diplomacy that defend their interests.

Honduras has been his first experience and, at the same time, his first disappointment on the continent when discovering that his good intentions were not enough to brake the politics of the empire.  So, we continue believing that it's possible that some day this president, who wants to be fair with his people, will also rise in rebellion against the empire that is destroying the continent through its local flunkies, and that he too will unite with the exploited people of the world.

Do you agree with those who say that there was direct involvement on the part of the United States in the coup, and that this country had the objective of stopping the advance of ALBA in the region and to shift the position being taken in this part of the continent?

It seems like a perfect crime, but all crimes have their errors, and in this case they chose the wrong country, president, people and historical moment.  We cannot speak of the involvement of the United States in the coup, but of a sector of its government, because in Honduras not a leaf moves without the accompaniment or knowledge of these traditional sectors of US politics, who are those that defend the interests of the empire of the transnationals.

What we have to do is identify who are the criminals in our country and denounce them before the world. Those who are outside of Honduras will have to be judged by all peoples of the world for their intervention and interference, which historically has brought us coup d'états, foreign military bases, and the terror and horror of war.

With regard to ALBA, it's evident that on the continent it was looked at as an initiative where it suited only the left.  But suddenly President Zelaya, a traditional-style liberal, decided along with his people to join this initiative.  This generated tremendous fear.  The poor example of Honduras had to be extirpated, because it had also been born in a country whose economy depends on the United States, and where there's one of its largest military bases.

Intolerance reemerged from the ashes when Honduras accepted the ALBA.   At the national level there were too many interests to defend on the part of the coup forces.  There was no pre-written script, but rather a structure that was prepared to act at any moment, with a great capacity for reaction, and that was made up of the army, the media, the heads of the church and political forces infiltrated within the State and economic powers capable of maintaining it.

However, they weren't able to anticipate the people's response.  They've not been able to stabilize their power and won't be able to legitimize even taking a bath in holy water, because they'll always be criminals, and this is generating great panic among them.

What role has the resistance played in this whole process?

It's had a fundamental role.  The resistance is an enormous part of the Honduran society that stood up; it struggles and marches, telling to history and the world what it is to feel and think, and the yearnings of an entire people.  The resistance is the conscience of the Honduran people and the opposition to the groups in power, those same powers that have plundered, crushed and humiliated them.  But they are now standing up, with dignity.

On January 27, 2010 ends the mandate of President Zelaya and that of his cabinet. What will you do after that date and after having spent four months outside of your country?

I don't have any proceedings pending against me in Honduras that would prevent me from returning.  The constitutional government ends when the reinstated president gives it up as ended.  When he stops being a servant of our people from public office, I will return to my people, as I have always done - like the two years during which I experienced my first coup d'état, my first confinement and exile. I will return to continue struggling beside my people. I will return to where my people love me. That's where I'll be.


1 Comment (Open | Close)

1 Comment To "Interview with Honduras FM Rodas"

#1 Comment By grok On November 17, 2009 @ 11:39 am

So after the 2009.11.29 elections… what? What will the honduran Resistance do? There will be an 'elected' coup government which will claim even more legitimacy then — and be aided in this by world reaction, and even plenty of liberals. And they will NOT allow hondurans to stage a Constituent Assembly. No way.

So what is the Resistance going to DO, then..?

[And for the record: there is no such thing as an "international community", either. That's another (longtime) fraudulent concept that should be put to bed. However, there is still class struggle. THAT is real.]


Article printed from Havana Times.org: http://www.havanatimes.org

URL to article: http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=16241

URLs in this post:
[1] Exclusive : http://www.rel-uita.org/internacional/honduras/con_patricia_rodas-2.htm
[2] : http://www.rel-uita.org
[3] Rel-UITA: http://www.rel-uita.org/internacional/honduras/un_pueblo_en_emergencia.htm%20%20%20

URL to article: http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=16241

URLs in this post:
[1] Exclusive : http://www.rel-uita.org/internacional/honduras/con_patricia_rodas-2.htm
[2] : http://www.rel-uita.org
[3] Rel-UITA: http://www.rel-uita.org/internacional/honduras/un_pueblo_en_emergencia.htm%20%20%20


http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=16241
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Education for Liberation! Venceremos Unidos!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://twitter.com/Peta51

http://help-matrix.ning.com/ 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++